<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>USLegal Reporter &#187; Criminal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reporter.uslegal.com/category/criminal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com</link>
	<description>Just another USLegal Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ban on Ohio Executions Lifted</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/11/25/ban-on-ohio-executions-lifted/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/11/25/ban-on-ohio-executions-lifted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lethal injection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 6th U.S. Circuit Courtof Appeals in Cincinnati has declared moot an inmate&#8217;s challenge to the state&#8217;s lethal injection method, due to a policy change by the state. Kenneth Biros, Ohio death row inmate convicted of aggravated murder, challenged the state&#8217;s three drug vein injection method as being unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment. The Ohio Revised Code [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 6th U.S. Circuit Courtof Appeals in Cincinnati has declared moot an inmate&#8217;s challenge to the state&#8217;s lethal injection method, due to a policy change by the state. Kenneth Biros, Ohio death row inmate convicted of aggravated murder, challenged the state&#8217;s three drug vein injection method as being unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment. The Ohio Revised Code mandates lethal injection as the manner of execution.<span id="more-956"></span></p>
<p>Biros&#8217; execution on December 8, 2009 was stayed, but will now proceed due to the state&#8217;s policy change. A U.S. District Court judge had temporarily delayed Biros&#8217; execution after the governor halted the lethal injection of another inmate in September because prison staff could not find a suitable vein. The new state policy is a change from a three-drug intravenous lethal injection to a one-drug IV injection, with a two-drug muscle injection serving as a backup.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/Federal-court-allows-Dec-8-execution-in-Ohio">http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/Federal-court-allows-Dec-8-execution-in-Ohio</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fox8live.com/news/national/story/Lawyer-Ohios-lethal-injection-a-human-experiment/TvSC0wkNu0uejfkRbdDGaw.cspx?rss=2210">http://www.fox8live.com/news/national/story/Lawyer-Ohios-lethal-injection-a-human-experiment/TvSC0wkNu0uejfkRbdDGaw.cspx?rss=2210</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/11/25/ban-on-ohio-executions-lifted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds Announce Policy Not to Prosecute Medical Marijuana Users</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/10/20/feds-announce-policy-not-to-prosecute-medical-marijuana-users/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/10/20/feds-announce-policy-not-to-prosecute-medical-marijuana-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under new legal guidelines issued by the Obama administration, federal drug agents won&#8217;t target pot-smoking patients or their sanctioned suppliers in states that allow medical marijuana.  &#8221;It will not be a priority to use federal resources to prosecute patients with serious illnesses or their caregivers who are complying with state laws on medical marijuana, but we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under new legal guidelines issued by the Obama administration, federal drug agents won&#8217;t target pot-smoking patients or their sanctioned suppliers in states that allow medical marijuana.  &#8221;It will not be a priority to use federal resources to prosecute patients with serious illnesses or their caregivers who are complying with state laws on medical marijuana, but we will not tolerate drug traffickers who hide behind claims of compliance with state law to mask activities that are clearly illegal,&#8221; Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement.</p>
<p><span id="more-927"></span></p>
<p>A memo on the new policy was sent to federal prosecutors in 14 states.  14 states allow some use of marijuana for medical purposes: Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. Some medical marijuana advocates say Maryland shouldn&#8217;t be included in that group, because the law there only allows for reduced penalties for medical marijuana usage.</p>
<p>Source:  <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/healthcare/articles/2009/10/19/ap_newsbreak_new_medical_marijuana_policy_issued/">http://www.boston.com/business/healthcare/articles/2009/10/19/ap_newsbreak_new_medical_marijuana_policy_issued/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/10/20/feds-announce-policy-not-to-prosecute-medical-marijuana-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Restricts Warrantless Searches of Vehicles</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/04/22/supreme-court-restricts-warrantless-searches-of-vehicles/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/04/22/supreme-court-restricts-warrantless-searches-of-vehicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrantless search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police may not conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle after an arrest unless the suspect poses a safety threat to the officer, the suspect is able to reach for a weapon or try to destroy evidence,  or there is reason to believe evidence of a crime will be found. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police may not conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle after an arrest unless the suspect poses a safety threat to the officer, the suspect is able to reach for a weapon or try to destroy evidence,  or there is reason to believe evidence of a crime will be found. The court&#8217;s 5-4 decision will mean a change in police practices in use since the leading case, New York v. Belton, was decided in 1981.</p>
<p> In the dissenting opinion, Justice Alito criticized the majority opinion for creating an unclear standard that the dissent claimed will be confusing for law enforcement officers to follow and endanger their safety. The majority said the earlier Belton case was misinterpreted to mean that officers may search the passenger compartment of a vehicle as part of a lawful arrest of a suspect. The dissent accused the majority of using the misinterpretation explanation as an excuse to change a law it disagreed with.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/Supreme-Court-limits-warrantless-vehicle-searches">http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/Supreme-Court-limits-warrantless-vehicle-searches</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/04/22/supreme-court-restricts-warrantless-searches-of-vehicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Katrina Fraud Charges Against Mississippi Mayor</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/01/29/katrina-fraud-charges-against-mississippi-mayor/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/01/29/katrina-fraud-charges-against-mississippi-mayor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Della Sellers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Katrina Fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brent Warr, mayor of Gulfport, Mississippi, has been indicted for conspiring to defraud the federal government and filing a false claim for Hurricane Katrina disaster assistance. After entering a not-guilty plea Wednesday, Warr says he plans to continue in his position as mayor.
Warr and his wife are being charged with trying to obtain a grant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent Warr, mayor of Gulfport, Mississippi, has been indicted for conspiring to defraud the federal government and filing a false claim for Hurricane Katrina disaster assistance. After entering a not-guilty plea Wednesday, Warr says he plans to continue in his position as mayor.</p>
<p>Warr and his wife are being charged with trying to obtain a grant for a beach house they owned but did not live in. The government is seeking to forfeit $222,798 in funds, and Warr faces a prison sentence of up to 210 years and fines totalling $4 million if convicted on all charges.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i1iPkSKCbK1qKls7wV3kv5nBUFmgD960CO3O1">http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i1iPkSKCbK1qKls7wV3kv5nBUFmgD960CO3O1</a><br />
<a href="http://www.wlox.com/Global/story.asp?S=9746725&amp;nav=menu40_11">http://www.wlox.com/Global/story.asp?S=9746725&amp;nav=menu40_11</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/01/29/katrina-fraud-charges-against-mississippi-mayor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NJ Supreme Court Hears Witness Intimidation Case</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/01/06/nj-supreme-court-hears-witness-intimidation-case/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/01/06/nj-supreme-court-hears-witness-intimidation-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racketeering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bornstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confrontation clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witness intimidation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Jersey Deputy Attorney General Daniel Bornstein told the state&#8217;s highest court that there are many instances of witnesses unwilling to testify in domestic violence, gang violence, and organized crime due to being threatened and intimidated. Witness intimidation is being blamed as the biggest obstacle to successful prosecution in such cases.
The state is urging the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey Deputy Attorney General Daniel Bornstein told the state&#8217;s highest court that there are many instances of witnesses unwilling to testify in domestic violence, gang violence, and organized crime due to being threatened and intimidated. Witness intimidation is being blamed as the biggest obstacle to successful prosecution in such cases.</p>
<p>The state is urging the court to allow statements of out-of-court witnesses who have been victims of intimidation to be used at trial without presenting the witnesses themselves. Defense lawyers claim that allowing the statements to be used without presenting the witness would violate the defendants&#8217; constitutional right to confront accusers.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/NJ-high-court-hearing-case-on-witness-intimidation">http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/NJ-high-court-hearing-case-on-witness-intimidation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/01/06/nj-supreme-court-hears-witness-intimidation-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Allows Harsher Penalties for Illegal Guns in Big Cities</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/12/09/court-allows-harsher-penalties-for-illegal-guns-in-big-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/12/09/court-allows-harsher-penalties-for-illegal-guns-in-big-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing guidelines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals approved imposing harsher penalties on illegal gun trafficking offenses in major metropolitan cities. The case involved a gun smuggler who received a sentence 6 months longer than the sentence recommended by the federal sentencing guidelines.
The appeals court said the evidence pointed to the defendant&#8217;s knowledge that the guns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals approved imposing harsher penalties on illegal gun trafficking offenses in major metropolitan cities. The case involved a gun smuggler who received a sentence 6 months longer than the sentence recommended by the federal sentencing guidelines.</p>
<p>The appeals court said the evidence pointed to the defendant&#8217;s knowledge that the guns he sold in Florida were destined for New York City. The judge who imposed the sentence based it on the urgent need to deter gun trafficking into large metropolitan areas. The appeals court found that, &#8220;Where the profits to be made from violating a law are higher, the penalty needs to be correspondingly higher to achieve the same amount of deterrence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/NYC-court-Big-city-guns-can-equal-stiff-sentence">http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/NYC-court-Big-city-guns-can-equal-stiff-sentence</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/12/09/court-allows-harsher-penalties-for-illegal-guns-in-big-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prison Teleconferencing Gains Popularity Due to Tight Budgets</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/11/25/prison-teleconferencing-gains-popularity-due-to-tight-budgets/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/11/25/prison-teleconferencing-gains-popularity-due-to-tight-budgets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court appearances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teleconferencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videoconferencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to tight state budgets and safety concerns, more states are using teleconferencing rather than transporting prisoners to court. Connecticut, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Tennessee report an increase in use of teleconferences between judges and inmates.
In one example of transporting a high security prisoner to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to tight state budgets and safety concerns, more states are using teleconferencing rather than transporting prisoners to court. Connecticut, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Tennessee report an increase in use of teleconferences between judges and inmates.</p>
<p>In one example of transporting a high security prisoner to a court hearing, attended by corrections officers and two state troopers, Connecticut estimates it costs the state at least $1,600 per hearing. This year, Connecticut has completed installing teleconferencing equipment in all of its 18 correctional facilities. Kansas uses teleconferencing for parole hearings and internal disciplinary matters, and is seeking to expand its use. Teleconferencing is used in Pennsylvania for court cases, parole hearings and immigration hearings, as well as employee meetings and regional training sessions. Facing an economic downturn, more states are expected to use teleconferencing to save on the expenses for vehicles, vehicle maintenance, gasoline, drivers, and security personnel, associated with the transportation of prisoners.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lexisone.com/news/ap/ap112408b.html">http://www.lexisone.com/news/ap/ap112408b.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/11/25/prison-teleconferencing-gains-popularity-due-to-tight-budgets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vice President Cheney Indicted by Texas Grand Jury</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/11/18/vice-president-cheney-indicted-by-texas-grand-jury/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/11/18/vice-president-cheney-indicted-by-texas-grand-jury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Gonzales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A grand jury from South Texas has indicted Vice President Dick Cheney and former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. The charges are related to alleged abuse of prisoners in Willacy County&#8217;s federal detention centers.  Cheney reportedly has an investment in the Vanguard Group, which has an interest in private prison companies that run federal detention [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A grand jury from South Texas has indicted Vice President Dick Cheney and former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. The charges are related to alleged abuse of prisoners in Willacy County&#8217;s federal detention centers.  Cheney reportedly has an investment in the Vanguard Group, which has an interest in private prison companies that run federal detention centers.</p>
<p>Gonzales is accused of improperly using his position to stop an investigation into alleged abuses at the federal detention centers.</p>
<p>Sources: <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/6119394.html">http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/6119394.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/brownsvilleherald_91922___article.html/attorney_state.html">http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/brownsvilleherald_91922___article.html/attorney_state.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/11/18/vice-president-cheney-indicted-by-texas-grand-jury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alaska Senator Convicted on Corruption Charges</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/10/27/alaska-senator-convicted-on-corruption-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/10/27/alaska-senator-convicted-on-corruption-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Ted Stevens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Ted Stevens was convicted today on seven counts of corruption related to lying about gifts and services received.
A federal jury found Stevens guilty of knowlingly failing to disclosure more than $250,000 in gifts and services including remodeling work on his home, an expensive massage chair, a sled dog and others items which he received [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Ted Stevens was convicted today on seven counts of corruption related to lying about gifts and services received.</p>
<p>A federal jury found Stevens guilty of knowlingly failing to disclosure more than $250,000 in gifts and services including remodeling work on his home, an expensive massage chair, a sled dog and others items which he received from friends.</p>
<p>Senate ethics rules require annual financial disclosure forms. Stevens was found to have made false statements on disclosure forms from 1999 to 2006.</p>
<p>The maximum sentence on each of the felony charges is five years in prison and up to a $250,000 fine.</p>
<p>Stevens has served in the Senate for more than 40 years. He says he plans to continue to run for re-election.</p>
<p>Sources: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/washington/28stevens.html?hp">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/washington/28stevens.html?hp</a></p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=6088781&amp;page=1">http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=6088781&amp;page=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/10/27/alaska-senator-convicted-on-corruption-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio Inmate Asks for Clemency Due to Obesity</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/08/26/ohio-inmate-asks-for-clemency-due-to-obesity/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/08/26/ohio-inmate-asks-for-clemency-due-to-obesity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lethal injection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inmate Richard Cooey, who was convicted of killing two college students in 1986 and is scheduled to be executed, has asked for clemency due to his obesity. Cooey claims that his obesity will prevent him from being properly executed by lethal injection, due to the difficulty of finding a vein. He also claims that his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inmate Richard Cooey, who was convicted of killing two college students in 1986 and is scheduled to be executed, has asked for clemency due to his obesity. Cooey claims that his obesity will prevent him from being properly executed by lethal injection, due to the difficulty of finding a vein. He also claims that his weight could diminish the effectiveness of one of the lethal injection drugs. Cooey stands 5 feet 7 and weighs 267 pounds. </p>
<p>Cooey made a similar request in 2003, which the Ohio Parole Board denied. Cooey came within a day of being executed that year before a federal judge issued a reprieve. If his execution proceeds as scheduled on October 14, 2008, it will be the first execution in Ohio since the end of a moratorium while the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed Kentucky&#8217;s lethal injection procedure.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-08-25-death-row_N.htm">http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-08-25-death-row_N.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/08/26/ohio-inmate-asks-for-clemency-due-to-obesity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
