<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>USLegal Reporter &#187; Redistricting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reporter.uslegal.com/category/redistricting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com</link>
	<description>Just another USLegal Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:47:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court Upholds Colorado Redistricting Plan</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2007/03/06/us-supreme-court-upholds-colorado-redistricting-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2007/03/06/us-supreme-court-upholds-colorado-redistricting-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Redistricting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/2007/03/06/us-supreme-court-upholds-colorado-redistricting-plan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that four challengers did not have legal standing to file suit to try to overturn a 2002 redistricting plan imposed by a judge. When Colorado legislators were unable to redraw the congressional map after the 2000 census, Colorado District Judge John Coughlin imposed a plan. The four citizens had argued that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that four challengers did not have legal standing to file suit to try to overturn a 2002 redistricting plan imposed by a judge. When Colorado legislators were unable to redraw the congressional map after the 2000 census, Colorado District Judge John Coughlin imposed a plan. The four citizens had argued that the judicially imposed plan &#8220;violated the [Elections Clause] of the U.S. Constituiton by depriving the state legislature of its responsibility to draw congressional districts.&#8221;&#8216;  In rejecting the citizens right to bring the law suit, the Supreme Court said that private citizens lacked standing to bring such suits, only state governments can sue over redistricting matters.</p>
<p>&#8220;The only injury plaintiffs allege is that the law -specifically the Elections Clause- has not been followed. This injury is precisely the kind of undifferentiated, general grievance about the conduct of the government that we have refused to countenance in the past,&#8221; said the Court.</p>
<p>The current redistricting plan remains in place until 2010.</p>
<p>The case is Lance v. Dennis, 06-641.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/06-641.pdf">http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/06-641.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2007/03/06/us-supreme-court-upholds-colorado-redistricting-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
