<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>USLegal Reporter &#187; exclusive service provider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reporter.uslegal.com/tag/exclusive-service-provider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com</link>
	<description>Just another USLegal Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:29:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Federal Court Denies Cable Company Exclusive Rights</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/05/27/federal-court-denies-cable-company-exclusive-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/05/27/federal-court-denies-cable-company-exclusive-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusive service provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Court of Appeals held that a cable company can&#8217;t force all residents of a multi-unit apartment building to use its services if it wires the building. The decision upheld a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision that such exclusive provider agreements are anticompetitive.
Banning exclusive agreements could help promote competition and reduce cable rates for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Court of Appeals held that a cable company can&#8217;t force all residents of a multi-unit apartment building to use its services if it wires the building. The decision upheld a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision that such exclusive provider agreements are anticompetitive.</p>
<p>Banning exclusive agreements could help promote competition and reduce cable rates for an estimated 100 million consumers, FCC members said in interviews. About a quarter of the U.S. population lives in apartments, and industry experts estimate that 5 to 10 percent of those buildings have exclusive contracts. Many contracts last 5 to 10 years, while a few can last indefinitely.</p>
<p>The move will open the door for telephone giants Verizon and AT&amp;T, which now offer video services, and smaller cable competitors such as RCN. Those companies have argued that long-term cable contracts lock them out of key markets.</p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/Court-says-no-exclusive-cable-rights-in-apartments">http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/Court-says-no-exclusive-cable-rights-in-apartments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2009/05/27/federal-court-denies-cable-company-exclusive-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
