<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>USLegal Reporter &#187; pleasant grove</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reporter.uslegal.com/tag/pleasant-grove/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com</link>
	<description>Just another USLegal Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to Decide Public Display of Religious Monuments Case</title>
		<link>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/11/18/supreme-court-to-decide-public-display-of-religious-monuments-case/</link>
		<comments>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/11/18/supreme-court-to-decide-public-display-of-religious-monuments-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleasant grove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reporter.uslegal.com/?p=622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A small religious group called Summum has sued Pleasant Grove City, Utah for the right to display their &#8220;Seven Aphorisms of Summum&#8221; in a city park. A Ten Commandments display was donated and has been displayed in the city&#8217;s Pioneer Park since 1971.
Summum&#8217;s position is that once a city accepts donations for a public park [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small religious group called Summum has sued Pleasant Grove City, Utah for the right to display their &#8220;Seven Aphorisms of Summum&#8221; in a city park. A Ten Commandments display was donated and has been displayed in the city&#8217;s Pioneer Park since 1971.</p>
<p>Summum&#8217;s position is that once a city accepts donations for a public park display, it must accept others as well. Veterans groups fear that if this position is accepted, a display of a memorial honoring veterans would also welcome a display dishonoring veterans. A federal appeals court ruled that the city violated First Amendment rights by allowing some private donations in its public park and denying others. The Court will have to decide whether a donated monument in a public park amounts to governmental speech or private speech. The government is permitted to limit its own speech as long as it doesn&#8217;t restrict private speech. Another issue to be decided is whether a city park is a &#8220;public forum,&#8221; where free speech is entitled to maximum First Amendment protection.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/High-court-hears-dispute-over-religious-monument">http://www.breakinglegalnews.com/entry/High-court-hears-dispute-over-religious-monument</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reporter.uslegal.com/2008/11/18/supreme-court-to-decide-public-display-of-religious-monuments-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
